I'd like to get to the bottom of the lighting issue here. If someone were to have a 400watt hps in a 4x4 area, would they DOUBLE their yield by adding an additional 400watter(using lst method, so not worried about the penetration issue), with all other factors being equal? Or what would a realistic increase be in yield? I'm trying to figure out if the cost to yield would be worth it in the end.
Watts vs. Yield
- Thread starter old blue
- Start date
K
Kupunakane
Guest
Yo Ho old blue,
The chase for more Lumens is a beautiful thing. As long as your not burning your babies up then you only need to consider what is realistic. In a 4X4 area a 600 watt Hps with a lean towards the blue shift will do well. Obviously 800 watts would surpass that as would a 1000 watter. The plants will take as much as you wish to give them. Consider how many Lumens are put out by the Sun !!
It comes down to what you can afford, and can you dispense the heat, and will your large increase in electrical usage draw attention.
smoke in peace
KingKahuuna
The chase for more Lumens is a beautiful thing. As long as your not burning your babies up then you only need to consider what is realistic. In a 4X4 area a 600 watt Hps with a lean towards the blue shift will do well. Obviously 800 watts would surpass that as would a 1000 watter. The plants will take as much as you wish to give them. Consider how many Lumens are put out by the Sun !!
It comes down to what you can afford, and can you dispense the heat, and will your large increase in electrical usage draw attention.
smoke in peace
KingKahuuna
KingKahuuna said:
I'm not worried about cost. But i DO want to use the 400 i already have also. I pretty sure heat won't be a problem either, cause it'll be in a walkin closet. and if need be, i'll vent exhaust into the attic and add a portable a/c. What would u recommend adding to my 400 for that size space? i didn't know if it would make growth uneven if i connect a 600 to a 400. I may even decide to go to a 4x5 space instead for a lil more room, if i'm adding more lighting.
I just thought of something. How bout adding one of those $20 150watt hps vapor tight lights to each end of my 400??? That'll add 30,000 lumens for only $40, bringing my total up to 85,000 lumens. ;-) Or do u think it'd be possible to fit one of those 150 watters onto each side of a cooltube, or would the bulbs touch? hmmm.
T
The Hemp Goddess
Guest
Puffnstuff has a good thread in the DIY on air cooling a 150w hps.
http://www.marijuanapassion.com/forum/showthread.php?t=28235
I am working on a dual 150W cool tube set up. It is a bit different, but this thread inspired me.
http://www.marijuanapassion.com/forum/showthread.php?t=28235
I am working on a dual 150W cool tube set up. It is a bit different, but this thread inspired me.
T
The Hemp Goddess
Guest
old blue said:
Thanks. I got these lights at a yard sale for $2 each, but they were the enclosed yard light type of HPSs, so I think they are the same. The glass is a Pyrex Bakearound, made for baking round bread loaves. They are not made anymore. I have purchased several from E-bay. I am going to do a DIY on this, but I have a bit of electrical work left to do. I may go ahead and start the DIY--all that's actually left is putting ends on the cords. I am going to use this light on a scrog that I have started (my first scrog).
i used a 400 for a 2x4 hydro tray for several grows and it did great IMO. so 2-400's for twice the space + or - the extra foot would work great. IMO the extra 400 would do much better than 2-150's and is probably more efficiant electrically. at 100 bucks its only 60 more than the 150's
A
Albrecht
Guest
The Hemp Goddess said:
That's cool HG. btw, what makes it a "cool tube"? Is it just that the lights are enclosed in glass, or do you have some kind of fan in the glass or something?
massproducer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2006
- Messages
- 1,776
- Reaction score
- 2,939
i would say that you will need atleast another 400, a 4 x 4 area is right on the upper limits of a 1000 watter, if you are using it efficiently. A 1000 will give you 62-63 watts per square foot, which is great, adding an extra foot in any deminsion will lower a 1000 to 50 watts per square foot, which is the lowest you really want to go.
I would consider getting another 600 to go with your 400
I would consider getting another 600 to go with your 400
T
The Hemp Goddess
Guest
Albrecht said:
It is called a cooltube because you do have the ability to cool it--in fact that is the only real reason for enclosing the bulbs in glass--so that you can put a fan and ducting onto the glass tube and cool the light. I am thinking that I will probably use CPU fans on this particular setup to cool the light. Since it is only 2 150W bulbs, I think that will be enough.
massproducer said:
Hey MP, instead of buying a 600 to add and a flouro setup for my vegging area, i'm probably better off just using my 400 with my mh bulb(it's htg's digital 400 w/a hps bulb and a mh bulb) for the vegging area instead of flouros, and then just buying a single 1000 hps for the flowering, right? That'll probably be a cheaper and more efficient way to go, huh?
A
Albrecht
Guest
The Hemp Goddess said:
So lemme see if I have this right. The glass doesn't get in the way of the light coming out, and the way that you cool it is put a duct perpendicular to the glass tube and then put a fan at the other end, and that will cool the whole light the best? Do you think that's better than having a smallish 6" fan blowing directly on the exposed bulb? Because I have two lights like those going, and plan on using then in subsequent grows, and would like to tighten up my setup for optimal cooling in the future.
T
The Hemp Goddess
Guest
This set up is not a lot different from the larger cooltube setups you can buy. If you have a larger light, a smallish fan does almost nothing to control the heat. With an enclosed bulb that is connected to ducting, the heat is actually "carried away" and exhausted where you want. In the winter, I use the heat from my lights to help warm my house.
Every light I use or have ever used has been air cooled. I think that it makes a big difference in the heat. I will need to mount some kind of reflector over this (unless I decide to use it vertically).
Every light I use or have ever used has been air cooled. I think that it makes a big difference in the heat. I will need to mount some kind of reflector over this (unless I decide to use it vertically).
raoulduke2.0
Norse God of Herbs
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2008
- Messages
- 193
- Reaction score
- 131
RIDERX70 said:
I think everyone would agree that High pressure sodium lights are unsurpassed in their ability to bring the best out of a plant.
PUFF MONKEY
TOWELIE IS MADE OF HEMP
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2008
- Messages
- 2,512
- Reaction score
- 1,530
.....other way around...i use a 1000w HPS for budding...only thing better is the sunRIDERX70 said:
Puffin Afatty
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2007
- Messages
- 2,565
- Reaction score
- 4,150
old blue said:
I use a 400 in a 4x4 area and my plant fills it completely. I tie her down alot to keep the canopy within the effective range of the 400w [20-22 inches] adding another light will do me no good above the canopy, however, using a stronger light [600/1000] or providing light below , would allow me to deepen the canopy and increase yield
that said, in a 4x4 area any lamp stronger than a 400w is largely wasted horizontally, while the vertical depth of the canopy can be deepened.:hubba: 
Hick
Git "R" lit
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2005
- Messages
- 12,839
- Reaction score
- 12,639
400 Watt HPS Hortilux Bulb - 54000 Lumens
4x4= 16 sq ft
54,000 in 16 sq ft = 3,375 L.p.sq ft.
I wouldn't say a 600 would be a "waste" at all..
600 watt hps 90,000 lumen
90,000 in 16 = 5,625 L.p.sq.ft
but about perfect.. IMO
4x4= 16 sq ft
54,000 in 16 sq ft = 3,375 L.p.sq ft.
I wouldn't say a 600 would be a "waste" at all..
600 watt hps 90,000 lumen
90,000 in 16 = 5,625 L.p.sq.ft
but about perfect.. IMO
Hick said:400 Watt HPS Hortilux Bulb - 54000 Lumens
4x4= 16 sq ft
54,000 in 16 sq ft = 3,375 L.p.sq ft.
I wouldn't say a 600 would be a "waste" at all..
600 watt hps 90,000 lumen
90,000 in 16 = 5,625 L.p.sq.ft
but about perfect.. IMO
With that being said, would a 1k be even better than the 600? Because if i'm buying a new light, there isn't much price difference between the 600 and the 1k. I know that heat is the big issue with more watts, but i'll be running a dedicated outside inlet and exhaust running thru an air cooled hood, so there shouldn't be too much of a problem. And i also have about 9' of ceiling height to move light around. Btw, i'm still not sure if i'll use 4x4 or 4x5 floor space. I want 4 big plants.
Similar threads
