Recent content by littlebigman

cool, thanks cq and back atya:)

cq the 1st amendment part of the case is unlike any ever filed in that it seeks to secure equal 1st amendment right for people like you, the ones that have no use for religion. Don't you deserve the same equal rights and protections in your religious refusal of religion as someone who claims...

Thanks...no worries...I must say though that I regret your lack of interest enough for the both of us...

Outside of the appeals court being fully and officially briefed to their apparent satisfaction, no. We are still awaiting the appeals court ruling. No news yet might be good news in this case. In regards to your mistaken interpretation of the issues at play in the case, you aren't even half...

yup:heart:

Sheesh! Thanks for all that you just went through to ask two simple questions in so far as i can tell.;) Anywho, yes you can see most of the filings in this case at: http://www.hemphasis.net/kiczenski.htm (its not my site, but the folks who run it have been following and posting their own...

Politics? Not at all. If you read the thread (while translating and surviving the headache) you will find direct arguments for challenging the rule rather than the exception. I asked for reasonable justification for continuing to just push for the exception, I cant say I've seen anything that...

Well actually that's not a very accurate description of the law in regards to what the law allows you to do in your garage. Manufacturing is also a violation of federal law, so is possession. Also, controlling "drugs" or "substances" does not necessarily grant authority to outlaw gardening for...

Cheers SB! I do respect you and of this you can be sure. Sory to come across in all the negative SB, I'm actually trying to be posotive:confused2: , maybe its my lack of social skils and formal education:o. Albert sure was a wildcat. I like these bits to: Albert Einstein, Sign hanging in...

well thats interesting and im glad 2 hear from ya, but im not quite sure thats what SB was say'n?... maybe SB can chime in on that... as 4 me i must offer that if so many that came b4 us had taken the position u seem 2 b taking here there would still b only white men voting while all others r...

good point, but the good thing about the usa system is that its set up so that when congress passes a manslaw and the executive branch signs it in2 officialdumb, it then can and should go 2 the third branch 4 check & balance... in this instance the issue of original gov authority 2 outlaw a...

well cq as 4 the first part of ur contribution, if i knew a better way 2 say it i would...but its input like urs that helps me know i must keep try'n 2 say it in whatever way i can... as 2 ur second point that exists partly in ur imagination, i must admit it does also partly exist in reality. b...

please recharge and come back :)

the life u live is not just 4 urself SB even if u pretend it is... we live bcuz of all that came b4 us and bcuz of all that exists now and 4 all the 1s that come after us...that reality is unavoidable... have u read about this case? http://www.hemphasis.net/kiczenski.htm its about the web of...

i can dig it SB... i would ask u 2 chew on this a bit though 4now... in the usa system there is implied consent if there is no objection... this applies 2 court, congress and the executive branches... if u challenge the exception but not the rule, u r then conceding that the rule is valid...thus...