German Gigalo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2006
- Messages
- 86
- Reaction score
- 15
I'm just little curious on how the whole junior member, member, senior member thing works. It seems like any one who posts more than 100 times is a senior member. Im not pointing any fingers, but some folks been here for like one month with 100 posts....and that is definatly not a senior member status. Such a title should be prestigious and be rated with time and reputation...only.
1.) join date ...........is cool, lets everyone know how long someone been around, excluding nonmember time.
2.) # of posts..........ok, now we know how many times you had opened your mouth, or even had some descent input.
3.) reputation...thats hot. How worthy are you to others and to the site.
all of these variables should stay, but it seems like the # of posts is the wrong choice to make judgement on "status". Just a thought
-Let me go ahead and post to myself a few more times so i too can be prestigious.
-If you have 100 posts and been here for 1 month, dont start flaming me. Dont take it as a diss, it not meant towards you. Its a suggestion towards the moderators what the setup of the site. Later.
-GG
1.) join date ...........is cool, lets everyone know how long someone been around, excluding nonmember time.
2.) # of posts..........ok, now we know how many times you had opened your mouth, or even had some descent input.
3.) reputation...thats hot. How worthy are you to others and to the site.
all of these variables should stay, but it seems like the # of posts is the wrong choice to make judgement on "status". Just a thought
-Let me go ahead and post to myself a few more times so i too can be prestigious.
-If you have 100 posts and been here for 1 month, dont start flaming me. Dont take it as a diss, it not meant towards you. Its a suggestion towards the moderators what the setup of the site. Later.
-GG