:hubba: At long last, policy makers in Washington have begun to draw a line between illicit drug use and the legitimate use of drugs as medicine. In March, Eric Holder, President Obama's attorney general announced that the federal government will no longer prosecute medical marijuana clinics that operate in compliance with state laws.
This means lawmakers in Harrisburg are now free to decide -- without interference from Washington -- if marijuana will fill a medical niche in Pennsylvania.
Thirteen states have already removed criminal penalties for the use of medical marijuana and actively regulate how, with a medical doctor's recommendation, marijuana is made available for patients with cancer, AIDS, multiple sclerosis, severe pain, glaucoma, epilepsy and other chronic conditions. But until now, Washington has disregarded these state laws. Since California legalized medical marijuana in 1996, for example, federal agents have raided more than 100 marijuana distribution centers there.
The first step has been taken with Washington's tacit acknowledgment that closing down state-regulated marijuana clinics is a misuse of taxpayers' money and harmful to Americans coping with serious illnesses.
Many thousands of ill people attest that smoking, vaporizing or orally ingesting marijuana relieves pain, nausea and other symptoms far more effectively than Marinol, a pharmaceutically available synthetic version of marijuana.
While the federal government still officially maintains -- contrary to solid medical evidence -- that marijuana has no medicinal value, at least it has pledged not to raid medical marijuana facilities that are sanctioned by state law.
According to the Marijuana Policy Project[/URL], a Washington-based advocate for legalizing medical marijuana, only 14 states, including Pennsylvania, have never passed a law dealing with medical marijuana. Pennsylvania need not reinvent the wheel and can easily avoid pitfalls along the way.
A 2006 poll asked registered voters in Pennsylvania if they favored "allowing adults to legally use marijuana for medical purposes if a doctor recommends it." Sixty-one percent said they did favor the measure.
Washington's new medical marijuana policy gives Pennsylvania the freedom to exercise its historic role as the primary watchdog for the health and welfare of its citizens. Whether Pennsylvania patients will be given greater access to medical marijuana is now up to the state Legislature.
Marijuana is not the only targeted medical drug.
This means lawmakers in Harrisburg are now free to decide -- without interference from Washington -- if marijuana will fill a medical niche in Pennsylvania.
Thirteen states have already removed criminal penalties for the use of medical marijuana and actively regulate how, with a medical doctor's recommendation, marijuana is made available for patients with cancer, AIDS, multiple sclerosis, severe pain, glaucoma, epilepsy and other chronic conditions. But until now, Washington has disregarded these state laws. Since California legalized medical marijuana in 1996, for example, federal agents have raided more than 100 marijuana distribution centers there.
The first step has been taken with Washington's tacit acknowledgment that closing down state-regulated marijuana clinics is a misuse of taxpayers' money and harmful to Americans coping with serious illnesses.
Many thousands of ill people attest that smoking, vaporizing or orally ingesting marijuana relieves pain, nausea and other symptoms far more effectively than Marinol, a pharmaceutically available synthetic version of marijuana.
While the federal government still officially maintains -- contrary to solid medical evidence -- that marijuana has no medicinal value, at least it has pledged not to raid medical marijuana facilities that are sanctioned by state law.
According to the Marijuana Policy Project[/URL], a Washington-based advocate for legalizing medical marijuana, only 14 states, including Pennsylvania, have never passed a law dealing with medical marijuana. Pennsylvania need not reinvent the wheel and can easily avoid pitfalls along the way.
A 2006 poll asked registered voters in Pennsylvania if they favored "allowing adults to legally use marijuana for medical purposes if a doctor recommends it." Sixty-one percent said they did favor the measure.
Washington's new medical marijuana policy gives Pennsylvania the freedom to exercise its historic role as the primary watchdog for the health and welfare of its citizens. Whether Pennsylvania patients will be given greater access to medical marijuana is now up to the state Legislature.
Marijuana is not the only targeted medical drug.
