Big (uk) Brothers watchin you!!!

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

7greeneyes

MedicalNLovingIt!
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
8,071
Reaction score
789
URL SOURCE: hXXp://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/technology/technologynews/5105519/Internet-records-to-be-stored-for-a-year.html Details of every email sent and website visited by people in Britain are to be stored for use by the state from tomorrow as part of what campaigners claim is a massive assault on privacy. ******************************************************** By David Barrett, Home Affairs Correspondent Last Updated: 3:20PM BST 05 Apr 2009 A European Union directive, which Britain was instrumental in devising, comes into force which will require all internet service providers to retain information on email traffic, visits to web sites and telephone calls made over the internet, for 12 months. Police and the security services will be able to access the information to combat crime and terrorism. Hundreds of public bodies and quangos, including local councils, will also be able to access the data to investigate flytipping and other less serious crimes. It was previously thought that only the large companies would be required to take part, covering 95 per cent of Britain's internet usage, but a Home Office spokesman has confirmed it will be applied "across the board" to even the smallest company. Privacy campaigners say the move to force telecoms companies to store the data is the first step towards the controversial central database at the heart of the Home Office's Intercept Modernisation Programme, which will gather far more detailed information on Britain's online activities. Simon Davies, director of Privacy International, said: "I don't think people are aware of the implications of this move. It means that everything we do online or on the phone will be known to the authorities. "They are using this to produce probably the world's most comprehensive surveillance system. "This is a disgraceful example of the covert influence that Brussels has across our freedoms and liberties. The entire episode has been marked by a litany of secret dealings, vicious political games and a complete absence of transparency." Phil Noble of privacy group NO2ID, said: "This is the kind of technology that the Stasi would have dreamed of. "We are facing a co-ordinated strategy to track everyone's communications, creating a dossier on every person's relationships and transactions. "It is clearly preparatory work for the as-yet un-revealed plans for intercept modernisation." Another EU directive which requires companies to hold details of telephone records for a year has already come into force, and although internet data is held on an ad hoc basis this is the first time the industry has faced a statutory requirement to archive the material. Information held includes the details of who contacted who, and when, but does not involve the content of emails being stored. The taxpayer will reimburse internet service providers and telecoms companies for the costs associated with storing the billions of individual records. Thierry Dieu of ETNO, the European telecoms networks operators association, said: "We regret that the legislation has been put through without real consultation with the players in the market. "The UK is the only country which has decided to reimburse the cost of retaining all the data. It remains to be seen whether this will cover all the costs." A Home Office spokesman said: "It is the Government's priority to protect public safety and national security. That is why we are completing the implementation of this directive, which will bring the UK in line with our European counterparts. "Letters will go out to communication service providers telling them that it is coming into force. We are talking across the board, to all communication providers." He said communications data played a "vital part" in a wide range of criminal investigations, such as the hunt for the killer of Rhys Jones, the 11-year-old schoolboy shot dead in Liverpool in 2007, and the prevention of terrorists attacks. "Without communications data, resolving crimes such as the Rhys Jones murder would be very difficult if not impossible. "Access to communications data is governed by Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act which ensures that effective safeguards are in place and that the data can only be accessed when it is necessary and proportionate to do so," he said. A European deal on storing data was first pursued by Charles Clarke when he was home secretary in 2005. At the time, a Home Office spokesman confirmed that a major mobile phone company which had previously stored its data for just two days had agreed to retain the information for a year in exchange for £875,000 in taxpayers' money. A report compiled by ETNO in 2004 said that a large internet service provider would need to store between 20,000 and 40,000 terabytes of data - of the equivalent of 40 trillion emails - if it was required to keep all traffic data for 12 months.
 
Go into any city or town and there is not a 6ft x 6ft square of ground that doesn't have CCTV watching it.


BB has been here a long time, the email and web surfing has been secretly happening for a long time too.

Do you think they suddenly get an idea and say hey .... lets do it next week.

It has been prepared and tested and had trial runs for at least 2 years before going public.

We all know they already scan all online activity for keywords that raise a flag to be monitored.

If this worries you, install a proxy, but don't think making and deleting email addresses will help you, its your ISP that is held on file.

If they want to spend hundreds of man hours looking and cross sectioning all the email addresses in this house (I have 2 and 4 other family members have 1 each) then that is up to them.

If they bust me and I get a slap for a small grow op for personal, it would cost many thousands of pounds for a £250 fine.

How long do you think the tax payer would put up with that?

This is like when fingerprints were discovered, a database was made to backtrack with.

This is going to be a milestone around all our necks.

If you have something as simple as a parking ticket in 2 years time, all your net activity will be searched and all emails between names looked at by your local council without you knowing it.

Am I ranting?

:rofl:

Be careful out there people.

:)

:peace:
 
IMO the hackers would have a field day, all that info just waiting for someone. To be the first to crash the system, nice little feather in their cap.
I wonder in a day when everyone is trying to save energy how big a waste of power this project would be. All those hard drives,fans ,servers, etc. Just does not make since to me.
 
HippyInEngland said:
Go into any city or town and there is not a 6ft x 6ft square of ground that doesn't have CCTV watching it.


BB has been here a long time, the email and web surfing has been secretly happening for a long time too.

Do you think they suddenly get an idea and say hey .... lets do it next week.

It has been prepared and tested and had trial runs for at least 2 years before going public.

We all know they already scan all online activity for keywords that raise a flag to be monitored.

If this worries you, install a proxy, but don't think making and deleting email addresses will help you, its your ISP that is held on file.

If they want to spend hundreds of man hours looking and cross sectioning all the email addresses in this house (I have 2 and 4 other family members have 1 each) then that is up to them.

If they bust me and I get a slap for a small grow op for personal, it would cost many thousands of pounds for a £250 fine.

How long do you think the tax payer would put up with that?

This is like when fingerprints were discovered, a database was made to backtrack with.

This is going to be a milestone around all our necks.

If you have something as simple as a parking ticket in 2 years time, all your net activity will be searched and all emails between names looked at by your local council without you knowing it.

Am I ranting?

:rofl:

Be careful out there people.

:)

:peace:
Big Brother was establised by Harry Anslinger for the DuPont Industry and perfected to a fine art by Tricky **** Richard m. Nixon with his creation of his DEA subterfuge (I can't believe Ben Stein wrote Nixon's speeches and was his lawyer, wowzers). You don't have to tell me about how long big brother's been around. The fact that Australia has to now register each CCTV unit purchased is ** too. So do all the paranoids w/ cctv's around their grows have to register too? Hahha Thank you for posting Hippy, Much P&L.7ge :)
 
what good news folks

lol

bb can suck my cock

lol

How long do you think the tax payer would put up with that?

well hie the tax payer usually has no say in the matters in which their taxes are used or maybe they do but it makes no differance still their taxes are used in the same way.

rhys thing thats a laugh they knew who killed the kid they just had to exploit/bully one of the gang members to grass up his mates then they checked his facebook/mobile text records and it all came together.

police/bb waste of space in the u.k. these days dont matter if cctv is installed once booze/coke etc come into the equation everyone turns into tenmen whether on camera or not

lol

better still i received a letter from enforcement dept of council tax today saying pay up or council will apply to magistrates court for my committal to jail..ok im a criminal im behind with my council tax bill cos they messed up 2 years ago and only last december sent me the relevant bill.

*** well bet ya wish you were a fly on the wall when i phone them tomorrow with my selected form of extremely foul language



uk420maan
 

Latest posts

Back
Top