Marijuana Myths Debunked

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

cadlakmike1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
1,327
Reaction score
1,715
This is not my research. This information was put together in June of 1994 by Dale Gieringer, Ph.D. Coordinator, California NORML. More information and references available here--> hxxp://paranoia.lycaeum.org/marijuana/facts/mj-health-mythology.html (Change xx to tt) This is very interesting information, I hope everyone enjoys it. There are a total of 18 myths on the site, here are a few.


Myth: Marijuana is a dangerous drug


Any discussion of marijuana should begin with the fact that there have been numerous official reports and studies, every one of which has concluded that marijuana poses no great risk to society and should not be criminalized. These include:
  • the National Academy of Sciences Analysis of Marijuana Policy (1982);
  • the National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse (the Shafer Report) (1973);
  • the Canadian Government's Commission of Inquiry (Le Dain Report) (1970);
  • the British Advisory Committee on Drug Dependency (Wooton Report) (1968);
  • the La Guardia Report (1944);
  • the Panama Canal Zone Military Investigations (1916-29);
  • and Britain's monumental Indian Hemp Drugs Commission (1893-4).
It is sometimes claimed that there is ``new evidence'' showing marijuana is more harmful than was thought in the sixties. In fact, the most recent studies have tended to confirm marijuana's safety, refuting claims that it causes birth defects, brain damag e, reduced testosterone, or increased drug abuse problems. The current consensus is well stated in the 20th annual report of the California Research Advisory Panel (1990), which recommended that personal use and cultivation of marijuana be legalized: "An objective consideration of marijuana shows that it is respo nsible for less damage to society and the individual than are alcohol and cigarettes."

References: The National Academy of Sciences report, Marijuana and Health (National Academy Press, 1982), remains the most useful overview of the health effects of marijuana, its major conclusions remaining largely unaffected by the last 10 years of research. Lovinger and Jones, The Marihuana Question (Dod d, Mead & Co., NY 1985), is the most exhaustive and fair-handed summary of the evidence against marijuana. Good, positive perspectives may be found in Lester Grinspoon's Marihuana, the Forbidden Medicine (Yale Press, 1993) and Marihuana Reconsidere d (Harvard U. Press 1971), which debunks many of the older anti-pot myths. See also Leo Hollister, Health Aspects of Cannabis, Pharmacological Reviews 38:1-20 (1986).


Myth: Marijuana is harmless

Just as most experts agree that occasional or moderate use of marijuana is innocuous, they also agree that excessive use can be harmful. Research shows that the two major risks of excessive marijuana use are:
  1. respiratory disease due to smoking and
  2. accidental injuries due to impairment.
Marijuana and Smoking:A recent survey by the Kaiser Permanente Center found that daily marijuana-only smokers have a 19% higher rate of respiratory complaints than non-smokers.(1) These findings were not unexpected, since it has long been known that, aside from its psychoactive ingredients, marijuana smoke contains virtually the same toxic gases and carcinogenic tars as tobacco. Human studies have found that pot smokers suffer similar kinds of respiratory damage as tobacco smokers, putting them at greater risk of bronchitis, sore throat, respiratory inflammation and infections.(2) Although there has not been enough epidemiological work to settle the matter definitively, it is widely suspected that marijuana smoking causes cancer. Studies have found apparently pre-cancerous cell changes in pot smokers.(3) Some cancer specialists have reported a higher-than-expected incidence of throat, neck and tongue cancer in younger, marijuana-only smokers.(4) A couple of cases have been fatal. While it has not been conclusively proven that marijuana smoking causes lung cancer, the evidence is highly suggestive. According to Dr. Donald Tashkin of UCLA, the leading expert on marijuana smoking:(5)"Although more information is certainly needed, sufficient data have already been accumulated concerning the health effects of marijuana to warrant counseling by physicians against the smoking of marijuana as an important hazard to health." Fortunately, the hazards of marijuana smoking can be reduced by various strategies:
  1. use of higher-potency cannabis, which can be smoked in smaller quantities,
  2. use of waterpipes and other smoke reduction technologies,(6) and
  3. ingesting pot orally instead of smoking it.

Myth: One joint equals one pack of (or 16, or maybe just 4) cigarettes


Some critics exaggerate the dangers of marijuana smoking by fallaciously citing a study by Dr. Tashkin which found that daily pot smokers experienced a "mild but significant" increase in airflow resistance in the large airways greater than that seen in persons smoking 16 cigarettes per day.(7) What they ignore is that the same study examined other, more important aspects of lung health, in which marijuana smokers did much better than tobacco smokers. Dr. Tashkin himself disavows the notion that one joint equals 16 cigarettes. A more widely accepted estimate is that marijuana smokers consume four times as much carcinogenic tar as cigarettes smokers per weight smoked. (8) This does not necessarily mean that one joint equals four cigarettes, since joints usually weigh less. In fact, the average joint has been estimated to contain 0.4 grams of pot, a bit less than one-half the weight of a cigarette, making one joint equal to two cigarettes (actually, joint sizes range from cigar-sized spliffs smoked by Rastas, to very fine sinsemilla joints weighing as little as 0.2 grams). It should be noted that there is no exact equivalency between tobacco and marijuana smoking, because they affect different parts of the respiratory tract differently: whereas tobacco tends to penetrate to the smaller, peripheral passageways of the lungs, pot tends to concentrate on the larger, central passageways.(9) One consequence of this is that pot, unlike tobacco, does not appear to cause emphysema.


Myth: Pot kills brain cells

Government experts now admit that pot doesn't kill brain cells.(8) This myth came from a handful of animal experiments in which structural changes (not actual cell death, as is often alleged) were observed in brain cells of animals exposed to high doses of pot. Many critics still cite the notorious monkey studies of Dr. Robert G. Heath, which purported to find brain damage in three monkeys that had been heavily dosed with cannabis.(9) This work was never replicated and has since been discredited by a pair of better controlled, much larger monkey studies, one by Dr. William Slikker of the National Center for Toxicological Research(10) and the other by Charles Rebert and Gordon Pryor of SRI International.(11) Neither found any evidence of physical alteration in the brains of monkeys exposed to daily doses of pot for up to a year. Human studies of heavy users in Jamaica and Costa Rica found no evidence of abnormalities in brain physiology.(12) Even though there is no evidence that pot causes permanent brain damage, users should be aware that persistent deficits in short-term memory have been noted in chronic, heavy marijuana smokers after 6 to 12 weeks of abstinence.(13) It is worth noting that other drugs, including alcohol, are known to cause brain damage.
 
California Research Advisory Panel...CRAP? anyone else find this funny?
this is a good read,and one could say its sad that this is what i pulled from it.not true at all,i just like the hilarity in things.
 
If you go to the website I think they do address short term memory loss in one of the myths.
 
haha, I'm living proof that smoking a large amount of dope will kill your short term memory. I work in a kitchen and my bad memory just kills my groove sometimes. My memory is SHOT!! I'm really trying to stop for smoking dank for around 45 days and see if I can gain it back..i'm on DAY 9, longest in years!!
 
According to the article it doesn't "kill" brain cells but does cause short term memory loss...


Even though there is no evidence that pot causes permanent brain damage, users should be aware that persistent deficits in short-term memory have been noted in chronic, heavy marijuana smokers after 6 to 12 weeks of abstinence.
 
The unfortunate thing to consider when researching the affects of any drug, is that it can cause different symptoms for everyone's individual physiology. Regardless of the statistics, you could be the one in a million who gets ultra depressed or shitzophrenic from getting high too much. It's pretty much all about weighing the risks with the joy of beingso high so high so high up in the sky ripped. Personally, I'll take the so high so high so high up in the sky ripped.

http://www.marijuanapassion.com/Site_Rules.html
Adding spaces or other characters to the filtered word is not acceptable here. If you attempt to bypass the filter by using any means, it's a direct act against the rules of this site.
 
i think i may have turned into a bit of a megalomaniac since i started smoking da herb... but it also made me more honest from being able to see any situation from a dozen points of veiw at the same time. anyone else get that?
and also i did a google search on alcohol and brain damage, and i think im bout to quit drinking. ganja's just safer in so many ways..
 
I'm dissapointed in the list because it only addresses myths as they relate to useing weed. I prefer to debunk all the myths associated with growing weed. So list up some myths folks, I'll start with one of my favorites. "Drying weed by hanging it upside down makes it more potent." I've heard this for years and it just never goes away.:rolleyes:
 
This is an old post, I did not write it I found the info on the net and thought I would share. If you do not like the article or feel the article was not in depth enough feel free to write to:
Dale Gieringer, Ph.D.
Coordinator, California NORML

Dr. Dale Gieringer received his Ph.D. at Stanford on the topic of DEA drug regulation. He is the author of articles on marijuana and driving safety, drug testing, marijuana health mythology, the economics of marijuana legalization, and DEA "drug enforcement abuse." He is presently working on a book on medical use of marijuana. He has also sponsored research on the use of water pipes and vaporizers to reduce harmful tars in marijuana smoke.

Dr. Gieringer is the state coordinator of California NORML, and a co-founder of the California Drug Policy Reform Coalition and of Californians for Compassionate Use.
 
Yea sorry about that I was searching for "myths" and after posting here, I found a "simular thread" listed at the bottom of the page and found all kinds of myths debunked here.
 
SherwoodForest said:
I'm dissapointed in the list because it only addresses myths as they relate to useing weed. I prefer to debunk all the myths associated with growing weed. So list up some myths folks, I'll start with one of my favorites. "Drying weed by hanging it upside down makes it more potent." I've heard this for years and it just never goes away.:rolleyes:

the myth that growing your own is hurting the environment:hubba:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top