Pot farm pollution: Too dangerous to deal with?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Grower13

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2011
Messages
3,832
Reaction score
138
By TRACIE CONE
Associated Press SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) - With parts of Northern California's scenic hillsides illegally gouged by bulldozers for marijuana grows, frustrated local officials asked the state for help to protect streams and rivers from harmful sediment and the chemicals used on the pot plants.
They hoped to charge growers under federal and state clean water regulations with tougher penalties than the infractions local officials could impose. But they were rebuffed.
It's too dangerous, the state agency in charge of protecting the region's water said in a letter to county supervisors.
"We simply cannot, in good conscience, put staff in harm's way," wrote Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Executive Director Paula Creedon.
As in many rural counties in California, marijuana farms are becoming more and more plentiful. They proliferate in the high Sierra, where armed Mexican cartel operatives clear wilderness areas, divert creeks and poison wildlife. Other smaller gardens are planted by people operating as collectives by pooling dozens of permits under the state's medical marijuana laws, though many of those are traffickers attempting to skirt the law. State law allows a person with a medical permit to grow roughly a dozen plants.
Butte County Supervisor Chairman Bill Connelly - frustrated that even photos of illegally scraped and terraced hillsides in sensitive watersheds didn't convince the water quality board to act - accused the board of not applying the law equally.
"My concern is that legitimate business people get harassed (by the agency), but illegal people will not be harassed because they get a pass," he said. "They go after the timber industry and farmers."
Penalties can range from cease & desist citations to fines of $5,000 for each day of the violation to more than $1 million, said state water board spokeswoman Kathie Smith.
The issue of large-scale marijuana enforcement and the damage some pot farms cause is not new in a region known as the Emerald Triangle, for the marijuana that has been produced there for decades. Marijuana is the state's biggest cash crop with an estimated $14 billion in legal and illegal sales annually.
California wildlife wardens and hikers in the state's remote backcountry occasionally happen upon gunmen guarding multimillion-dollar pot farms. It's 1 of the reasons the California Department of Fish & Wildlife recently issued its wardens more powerful weapons.
Those growers, when caught, are charged criminally in federal courts. But at the local level, counties are concerned with growers taking advantage of laws legalizing the growing of marijuana for medical uses. Even the legal farmers must comply with environmental laws.
The state's nine regional water boards are quasi-independent agencies that set their own policies, though all are charged with enforcing the federal Clean Water Act and its California equivalent. The Central Valley board, which focuses on runoff from farming, construction and hundreds of dairies, does not have a policy for investigating violations associated with marijuana grows.
"This is outside of our expertise," said Andrew Altevogt, assistant executive officer of the agency. "It's not the kind of thing that we do."
Yet its sister agency, the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board, aggressively seeks out and prosecutes growers who flatten remote hilltops, dam streams to divert water and allow sediment and chemicals to reach waterways.
In 2007 that agency joined an environmental crimes task force made up of county district attorneys and code enforcement agents.
"I initiated this because I thought it was the best way to get action on the things I was seeing," said Storm Feiler, a water board scientist who is part of the task force. "We have taken an active role because we have so many grow sites over here, and since 2007 there has been an astronomical increase. It's a really big issue for us."
The discrepancies in enforcement have come to the attention of Assembly Member Dan Logue, R-Loma Rica, who represents Butte County. He said it's the first time he's heard of a state agency refusing to enforce state laws.
He said that as marijuana farms proliferate, the issue of keeping creeks, streams and rivers free of toxins has become a statewide issue.
Logue sent a letter to the water board's Creedon expressing concern over the "diminishing water quality in this part of my district," and asking the agency to help find a way to enforce the Clean Water Act. He has asked for a meeting with members of Gov. Jerry Brown's staff in an attempt to force action.
"This has to be fixed," Logue said in an interview. "We have an issue in the state where agencies are fearful, and the law isn't being applied equally."
Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 
endless reasons to federally stop criminalization and destroying this country canada seems more and more the place to move nvm Maine....
 
It's a sticky situation for sure. What's the answer? Outlaw collectives? They could start by shooting the armed criminals. They are knowingly committing crimes, that's why they are armed on public lands.
Why is it the only people in the article seem to be saying "it's wrong because the timber industry can't get away with it"? No one should be doing it, and the state shouldn't give anyone a pass.
Maybe the federal Gov should legalise marijuana and take the money they are saving and put it towards preserving and protecting our national parks. And shoot illegals who come here specifically to commit crimes.
It may not be a perfect solution, but it's a start.
 
they would make so much money on it, even if black market trade increased at least it would be home grown not imported illegal sheeet. but they would bottom out the pharma co's
 
With the technology we have now days, if the feds wanted it stopped , it would be stopped. "Drones." Look at the money state and federal government make off it each year. You think the unemployment is high now look what it would be like after cutting 3/4 of the FDA employs. I can see a bright side to that.
 
cubby hate to say this but your land is being taken away even the feds can;t do nothing cause its just not owned by any american
Nixon had to collateralize that debt somehow, and he hit upon the plan of quietly setting aside huge tracts of American land with their mineral rights in reserve to cover the outstanding debts. But since the American people were already angered over the war in Vietnam, Nixon couldn't very well admit that he was apportioning off chunks of the United States to the holders of foreign debt. So, Nixon invented the Environmental Protection Agency and passed draconian environmental laws which served to grab land with vast natural resources away from the owners and lock it away, and even more, prove to the holders of the foreign debt that US citizens were not drilling. mining, or otherwise developing those resources. From that day to this, as the government sinks deeper into debt, the government grabs more and more land, declares it a wilderness or "roadless area" or "heritage river" or "wetlands" or any one of over a dozen other such obfuscated labels, but in the end the result is the same. We The People may not use the land, in many cases are not even allowed to enter the land.

This is not about conservation, it is about collateral. YOUR land is being stolen by the government and used to secure loans the government really had no business taking out in the first place.

You mention timber industry ???? you need to understand OIL n GAS Timber industry runs the world
 

Latest posts

Back
Top