Washington State stepping up to the plate

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

viper1951

legalization Warrior
Joined
Oct 5, 2008
Messages
125
Reaction score
89
local new paper poll
Poll
Should possession of marijuana be legal in Washington?
You voted: Yes

80% Yes

20% No



Total Votes: 92






SEATTLE — Five activists filed a ballot initiative Monday that would legalize all adult marijuana possession, manufacturing and sales under Washington state law — one of the most sweeping efforts at marijuana reform playing out around the country this year.
Its sponsors include two Seattle lawyers and the director of Seattle's annual Hempfest. They call themselves Sensible Washington, and say that in a time of dire budget woes, the state's government should stop spending money on police, court and jail costs for people who use or produce marijuana.
Douglas Hiatt, a lawyer who represents medical marijuana patients, told The Associated Press the proposal would remove all state criminal penalties for adults who possess, grow and distribute pot — no matter how much. Criminal penalties for juveniles who possess marijuana and for those who provide the drug to juveniles would remain in place.
Driving under the influence of the drug also would still be against the law. And marijuana would remain illegal under federal law.
"It basically tells the federal government, 'Hey it's your prohibition — if you want it, you pay for it,"' Hiatt said.
"We're tired of screwing around and wasting all this dough."
Volunteers are lining up to collect the more than 241,000 signatures required to place the initiative on the November ballot, Hiatt said.
The campaign has competition in Washington. One bill introduced here would legalize and regulate marijuana, while another would decriminalize possession of small amounts of pot, making it punishable by a fine rather than jail time.
Legalization bills have also been introduced in California, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Nevada, and a group campaigning to place a marijuana legalization measure before California voters said last month that it has enough signatures to qualify for this year's ballot.
Alison Holcomb, drug policy director at the American Civil Liberties Union of Washington, which is lobbying for the decriminalization bill, said she supports any effort to engage the public in discussing marijuana law reform, but she couldn't comment specifically on the initiative without reading it.
"If there were decriminalization of transfers of small amounts of marijuana not for profit, that might be one way to undermine the cartels' bottom line," she said. "But I think the push-back would be, are you just giving the gangsters a get-out-of-jail-free card in Washington state? Are you setting up incentives for criminal elements to come here and set up shop?"
Hiatt disputed that notion, saying the drug flourishes on the black market only because it is illegal. Furthermore, federal agents wouldn't stand for large-scale marijuana trafficking, he said.
He cited one recent study suggesting Washington could save tens of millions of dollars a year on law enforcement costs if marijuana was legal.
Hiatt said he was inspired to file the initiative in part by a recent conversation with Mason County prosecutor Gary Burleson, who told him to "put your money where your mouth is" and get an initiative before voters.
In an interview Monday, Burleson said he doesn't necessarily support legalizing marijuana - and certainly not in the unlimited, unregulated way the initiative proposes. But he said he's frustrated with Washington's complicated medical marijuana law, which authorizes patients to possess marijuana but is vague about how they can obtain it.
"Wouldn't legalizing this answer a whole lot of questions?" he said. "Aren't we just beating around the edges with all of these legal nuances?
"I don't have a problem with marijuana being legal, and I don't have a problem with it being illegal," Burleson said. "But right now, I have a big problem understanding what's legal and what's not."

Posted in on Monday, January 11, 2010 7:35 pm Updated: 7:38 pm.




I new this would be coming good news for us I threw the poll in for you to see where we are at here in Washington State So far
 
Unfortunately, most people do NOT understand that governmental regualtion and taqxation isw just another form of our current legal jeapordy only now the charge would be possession of MJ and after the "legalization and regulation" the charge would be possession of UNTAXED MJ. If you get fined or go to jail, does it really matter if it is because you grew an illegal substance or because they wouldn't let you pay tax on it so they charged you with tax evasion -- you are still in jail for the same thing -- growing your own pot! About the only difference is that under the "legalization and regulation" scheme the state makes money off of the pot that they LET the growers of their choosing grow and the rest of us still get screwed. That kind of a law is even worse than what we have now because it will be much harder to amend or repeal.

I realize I'm talking politics, but the who question of changing MJ laws is politics.

JUst expressing my opinion and take it or leave it as you choose.

Great smoking.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top