clone (kln)
n.
1. A cell, group of cells, or organism that is descended from and genetically identical to a single common ancestor, such as a bacterial colony whose members arose from a single original cell.
2. An organism descended asexually from a single ancestor, such as a plant produced by layering or a polyp produced by budding.
3. A DNA sequence, such as a gene, that is transferred from one organism to another and replicated by genetic engineering techniques.
4. One that copies or closely resembles another, as in appearance or function: "filled with business-school clones in gray and blue suits" (Michael M. Thomas).
v. cloned, clon·ing, clones
v.tr.
1. To make multiple identical copies of (a DNA sequence).
2. To create or propagate (an organism) from a clone cell: clone a sheep.
3. To reproduce or propagate asexually: clone a plant variety.
4. To produce a copy of; imitate closely: "The look has been cloned into cliché" (Cathleen McGuigan).
:yeahthat:Thanks Tater... I have cloned a clones clone and that clone become a Mother for more clones...and Im High as Hell...:bong:Tater said:Unless you have a spontaneous genetic mutation nothing will be lost. Everything else is wives tales with no science to back it. I have in my posession a plant that has been kept alive through cloning for over 13 years now and it is as potent as the day the seed was cracked. This plant has never been kept alive through the use of a long term mother and is instead cloned before each flowering cycle from the plants going into flowering. This means that in a given year the plant may have gone through 5 generations of cloning, multiply that by 13 years you get a possible 65 generations of cloning give or take depending on how active he was that year in his growing.
I've heard that pigs fly when the moon is full and they were fed corn the night before but I highly doubt this makes it true.
Number 4 does not apply to the discussion in either instance but was left for posterity.
StoneyBud said:Hick is right on target. Having never taken it so far, I've read in several sources that at between 11 and 13 generations of clones, the plant will have a MARKED decrease in thc and the plant characteristics will alter, sometimes to very strange new ways.
I've never gotten past a 5th generation, and oldest of those was a 20 year old strain of Thai that I finally let go.
Hick said:Clones of clones of clones of clone... "eventually" have lost vigor, health AND potency in my experiences. BUT only after probably a dozen generations or so.
"Personal" first hand experience.
there were no diseases.. I'm telling you what "I" personally have experienced on more than one occasion.Tater said:You say the plant lost health and vigor, is it not possible that these are the reasons that the potency was reduced? Perhaps the plant contracted a disease. Would either you or stoney please explain to me how a plant "forgets" its genetic code. How does a plant lose DNA?
Answer, it can't. Unless it suffered from a mutation at some point, which is beyond rare in mature plants.
You'll have to look them up. I would too now. It's been awhile.Tater said:Care to post your sources I would be interested in reading them.
I'm sorry, but because you haven't heard of it doesn't make it impossible. It's a recognised characteristic of marijuana clones. It's documented, so it won't be too hard for you to research. The reason for it in each source I've found, is unknown. Many theories, no solid proof of why it happens, but it happens consistently.Tater said:You say the plant lost health and vigor, is it not possible that these are the reasons that the potency was reduced? Perhaps the plant contracted a disease. Would either you or stoney please explain to me how a plant "forgets" its genetic code. How does a plant lose DNA?
Answer, it can't. Unless it suffered from a mutation at some point, which is beyond rare in mature plants.
Enter your email address to join: