Rehab is for Quitters said:
I was just reading an article that explained why minors (under 21) are legally permitted to drink alcohol in the Catholic Church, in spite of laws prohibiting such behavior: The State/Federal laws on alcohol consumption are trumped by the laws of Religious Freedom in the United States and drinking the "blood of Christ" is part of the religious doctrine of the Catholic Church.
So it occurred to me.....could Religious Freedom be applied to mj usage? What if smoking pot is part of my religious doctrine (as I believe is the case for Rastafarians)? Can the US government deny me the right to practice my religion??
Would appreciate any insight from you legal eagles out there. And if there is a glimmer of hope in this strategy, who wants to join my religion? :48:
Then again, booze isnt necessarily a controlled substance! Im sure the altar boys arent sitting in back killing bottles of wine either.
However, i am with you! the government does everything it can to prosecute the innocent, so in light of it, we should do the same. Let's throw the book at them!
The government makes these laws, however the government isnt perfect, just as we arent. We, the people, have to play their game! Use their tactics against them, and it will send them running with their tails tucked between their legs! This country is for the people and by the people, these days that motto seems lost, and its sad!
Like the Beastie Boys said, "You gotta fight! For your right, to PAAAAAA-RTY!"
Let's party! Every time they try to cut us down, like a weed we will grow in numbers again! When they push us down, lets take a hit and blow the wonderful aroma of freedom in their face!
WE ARE ALL FREE! I WAS BORN TO A WONDERFUL COUNTRY THAT I NEVER ONCE SAID I WOULD FOLLOW THE LAWS OF. I HAD NO VOTE IN THE LAWS SET IN THE PAST. WHY SHOULD I FOLLOW A LAW I HAD NO PART IN GETTING PASSED?
Laws of the past dont necessarily turn out to be worthwhile in the future, most of them time they do more harm and cost more money to enforce because they arent updated! Laws dating back to Cold War era have no relevance now days, why? There is no more Cold War! So those laws concerning the cold war should be abolished or revised!
I think a statutory review period of 10 years should be placed on all laws! After 10 years, a law is revised to reflect any new changes, and then those changes are voted on. If the majority votes the changes are unacceptable, they must continue to revise until the law is accepted by the majority. I also believe there should not be laws against the safe practices of ANY medical treatment, as long as it under a board certified physician in good standing.
Nova